Helpful Score: 7
This book generated quite a stir in the literary community--I think largely bcs no one understood what was going on in it! Is this like Firebird (Igor Stravinsky's avant-garde, misunderstood, seemingly chaotic piece that caused a riot when it was performed for the first time?) or Finnegan's Wake (James Joyce's seemingly nonsensical tome which is so complicated that *shelves* of lit crit have been produced trying to explain it)? Or is it just a wreck? I don't know. I couldn't make head or tail of it myself. But if you don't expect tidiness (neat endings to plotlines, for example, or explanations of any kind), there is a lot of very interesting stuff in this book.
Me, I think Murakami wrote it while he was feverish, and then never went back and revised.
:)
Me, I think Murakami wrote it while he was feverish, and then never went back and revised.
:)
Helpful Score: 4
Muakami has become virtually a genre unto himself - hallucinatory prose where even mundane events (a lost cat, a telephone conversation) seem to carry within them the seed of a disturbing nightmare even when delivered with humor. The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle is one of his best. A masterpiece.
Helpful Score: 3
Loved this book...read it straight through on a flight from Tokyo to the US. Fascinating, albeit metaphysical story, on the intertwining of generations, history and the present. Highly recommend.
Helpful Score: 2
I keep trying Murakami, y'all. I keep trying.
So I'm not really sure how to rate this book. This is one where I do feel like I recognize the quality of the writing so I'm inclined to give it a higher rating, but I didn't really enjoy reading it at all. It was kind of a chore to finish. I don't think it needed to be as long as it was, I think a lot of parts were extraneous, and while this wasn't the MOST annoying Murakami protagonist I've read he still grated on me. There was lots of what I guess I would define as magical realism? Which I don't really like anywhere, so I'm already starting with a negative opinion in terms of that.
I guess in the end where I'm coming down on Murakami is that most of his novels are the same protagonist having the same conflicts about the same broad concepts. Can we really connect with other people or are we fundamentally alone? I guess if you want to use your life's work to try to sort out one particular question that's your prerogative, but I don't know that it's a concept I personally am invested in reading about time and again.
As to recommendations, it seems like kind of a cop-out but: if you like Murakami, I'm sure you'll like this. If you don't, probably not. I know that's not a ton of help for new readers but I feel like there's enough about Murakami and his style out there that you can probably judge for yourself if you're interested.
IN SUMMARY: I'm giving this novel a 3 based on the quality of the writing and the fact that I think this is honestly probably a better book than I'm giving it credit for. BUT IT'S A RELUCTANT THREE.
So I'm not really sure how to rate this book. This is one where I do feel like I recognize the quality of the writing so I'm inclined to give it a higher rating, but I didn't really enjoy reading it at all. It was kind of a chore to finish. I don't think it needed to be as long as it was, I think a lot of parts were extraneous, and while this wasn't the MOST annoying Murakami protagonist I've read he still grated on me. There was lots of what I guess I would define as magical realism? Which I don't really like anywhere, so I'm already starting with a negative opinion in terms of that.
I guess in the end where I'm coming down on Murakami is that most of his novels are the same protagonist having the same conflicts about the same broad concepts. Can we really connect with other people or are we fundamentally alone? I guess if you want to use your life's work to try to sort out one particular question that's your prerogative, but I don't know that it's a concept I personally am invested in reading about time and again.
As to recommendations, it seems like kind of a cop-out but: if you like Murakami, I'm sure you'll like this. If you don't, probably not. I know that's not a ton of help for new readers but I feel like there's enough about Murakami and his style out there that you can probably judge for yourself if you're interested.
IN SUMMARY: I'm giving this novel a 3 based on the quality of the writing and the fact that I think this is honestly probably a better book than I'm giving it credit for. BUT IT'S A RELUCTANT THREE.
Helpful Score: 2
Chronicle is written in a very Japanese way. The plot gets fragmented easily and becomes obscure, both lending to an ethereal quality. Many threads begin, intertwine, and unravel during the book so if one is not paying attention and connecting seemingly disparate parts, the story can readily confuse a reader.
There are parts of the book that are graphic, especially parts detailing torture during the war. I would say that the style is similar to other Japanese media such as Anime or even video games, so if you enjoy those, you'll probably enjoy The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle.
There are parts of the book that are graphic, especially parts detailing torture during the war. I would say that the style is similar to other Japanese media such as Anime or even video games, so if you enjoy those, you'll probably enjoy The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle.